by William S. Lind, Antiwar, here. – A few weeks ago I wrote a column explaining why Senator John McCain is wrong on Iraq. In contrast, Senator Barack Obama is largely right on Iraq. Whether he would follow through on his plan for withdrawing U.S. troops is another question. The Democratic foreign policy establishment is no less Wilsonian than its Republican counterpart, and once it has used antiwar voters to gain power it will want to show them the door as soon as it dares.
But if Obama is right on Iraq, he is wrong on Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. His prescriptions for each are so close to the policies of the Bush administration that if McCain is McBush, Obama appears to be O’Bush. It seems many voters’ desire to climb up out of the Bush league altogether is doomed to frustration.
On Afghanistan, Obama wants to send in more troops and win the war. But more troops doing what U.S. troops now do – fighting the Pashtun and calling in airstrikes on anything that moves – guarantee we will lose the war. As was the case in Iraq, the first necessary step is to change what our troops are doing. From what I have seen, Obama has said nothing on that score, probably because his position on Afghanistan is mere posturing intended to show he will be “tough on terrorism.”
Obama’s position on Pakistan is even more dangerous. In August of 2007, Obama called for direct U.S. military action in Pakistan, with or without Pakistani approval. Speaking to the Woodrow Wilson Center, he said, “If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.” President Bush took Senator Obama’s recommendation this past July, authorizing such actions.
This is an example of the classic strategic error of sacrificing a more important goal to one of lesser importance. Not even outright defeat in Afghanistan would do America’s interests as much damage as would the disintegration of the Pakistani state and the transformation of Pakistan into another stateless region. The state of Pakistan is already dangerously fragile, and actions such as cross-border raids by American troops will diminish its legitimacy further. No government that cannot defend its sovereignty will last. Ironically, if Pakistan collapses, so does our position in Afghanistan, because our main logistics line will be cut. In effect, Obama wants to hand al-Qaeda and the Taliban a double victory.
In June of this year, Obama spoke to the annual AIPAC conference. What he said there about Iran put him once again firmly in the Bush camp:
“As President, I will use all elements of American power to pressure Iran. I will do everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon….
“There should be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action to defend our security and our ally Israel. Do not be confused.
“Sometimes there are no alternatives to confrontation. If we must use military force, we are more likely to succeed and have more support at home and abroad if we have exhausted our diplomatic options. That is the change we need in our policy.”
In other words, the change we need in our policy is to offer a bit more diplomatic kabuki before we attack Iran.
As I have said repeatedly and will keep on saying, an attack on Iran could cost us the whole army we have in Iraq. It could set the region on fire, from Afghanistan to the Nile. It could create an oil crisis with severe economic consequences at a time when the world economy is tottering. It is, in short, madness. But it is also what Obama promised AIPAC.
Here we see the central reality of American politics shining through the smoke and mirrors. America has a one-party system. That party is the Establishment Party, and its internal disagreements are minor. Both McCain and Obama are Establishment Party candidates. They agree America must be a world-controlling empire. Both men are Wilsonians, believing we must re-make other countries and cultures in our own image. Neither man conceives any real limits, political, financial, military or moral, on American power. McCain and Obama vie only in determining which can drink more deeply from the poisoned well of hubris, around which, unremarked, lie the bones of every previous world power.
Such is the “choice” the American people get in November.
Filed under: Campaign 2008, fake war on terror, Fuck Obama, get to know a sellout, Globalization, Iraq Tagged: | Campaign 2008, Obama wrong on Afghanistan
Just like we been saying… and did you know that slightly over 2 of our armed forces have died (by averaging) EACH day in the Iraqi war? What were the figures of the war or battle against Afganistan started oct 2001? those two years have to count also…
By now, Tehran was supposed to be reduce to rubble and much of the ME on fire, thanks to the wars for Empire and Israel.
That would have covered up the massive looting going on in Wall Street banks, since a good crime involving massive violence, death and the threat of world-wide nuclear war is always a good way to distract people from the ones in your kitchen, picking up your silver and grabbing any spare change you left on the kitchen table.
Except that nut case Georgian president didn’t read the Dick Cheney “How to Wage Wars and make obscene Profits” guidelines enough to realize that you don’t irritate the Russian Bear w/o backup.
When Russia went in to defend S. Ossetia, she also bombed the hell out of Georgian military weapons depots and airbases, like the two in S. Georgia the Israeli’s had been upgrading for their F-16(I) Fighter-Bombers.
It’s a helluva lot closer to Iran from Georgia than from Israel.
So the war against Iran got postponed by the bear and now, the pirate’s cove known as Wall Street has imploded from sheer greed.
Where o where to get that “Big Bang” type of distraction to inflame American’s while their pockets are getting picked?
Where indeed Greg. Anyone checked to see if any of those remote control flight systems Dov’s old company makes are missing?
“So the war against Iran got postponed by the bear and now, the pirate’s cove known as Wall Street has imploded from sheer greed.”
“Where o where to get that “Big Bang” type of distraction to inflame American’s…”
Reply: Yup, expect some kind of “October surprise”! — Possibly delayed by a week or two, but something is in the wind for sure. Remember, we’re dealing with predators who don’t ever give up (until killed) and will find a way to bring down their prey.
Iran holds the key to the Strait where 40% of the world’s oil goes thru–they got us by the balls.